Anyway tonight... I was reading Scot's blog when he said he was 52% addicted to blogging. He posts a set of links to other stuff on the web once a week on all kinds of subjects. This time, he had 2 posts linked I'd already read from friends/colleagues of mine (which made me feel important in a stupid sort of way), a bunch of others I skimmed, and then one on blog addiction.
Now, Scot must read WAY more blogs than I do. Plus, according to Marko.... Scot is somewhere next to Jesus in the number of people who subscribe to his blog and view it on the web and whatnot. I did my own study tonight and according to bloglines alone... this blog I'm typing right now has 9 readers who have subscribed to my blog. (and if I knew who they were, I guess I could just list them all off rather fast). Scot has like 600+. That requires like a phone book of names.
There's a million reasons why such a difference in readership.... not the least of which is that, Scot blogs several times a day and I blog several times a week- if I'm lucky. I sometimes even feel like I've committed some social ill if I don't blog more often... but I just beat that voice down cuz I simply don't have (1) the time or (2) much worth saying- and my 9 subscribers don't seem to be bothered much by it anyway.
So, I'm thinking, if I take this stupid test, I might end up like 25% addicted.
Not so fast....
62%
I think either Scot cheated and let his pet bird slam on the keys at random or this test is a farce.
I would love to subscribe to your blog. But everytime I enter it in to google reader it says that no feed is available. So I have to come to your blog to read.
ReplyDeleteI checked again. Still no feed.
ReplyDeleteI'll keep doing some research. Not sure why that would be... but I'll check with blogger and see if I have a button that is wrong or something.
ReplyDeletefeeds just fine into my bloglines
ReplyDelete